
Originally Posted by
SAMURAI36
Petey, actually, what I find you doing quite often, is talking out of the left side of your ass, making all sorts of asanine comments, like you're the expert on some shit that you're not.
And here's one prime example:
Perfect example.
I never once compared WD to JLD or HB. I compared WD to A+X. You know, ones a popular TV series, and the other is currently riding the coat tails of a hit movie? And you know what? You fucking did too. So now you are trying to change horses in the middle of the race, pretending like that wasn't our original convo.
You're not proving anyone wrong here; all's you end up doing is making yourself look more like the drugged-out retard that I know you to be, because you admitted to being as much.
So why don't you try policing yourself, rather than playing BC's makeshift moderator. There are more than enough village idiots on here, that think they are saying something more important than it really is.
Oh look, here comes one of them now....
Dude, seriously... PU KCUF EHT TUHS. Maybe saying it backwards will help it get thru to you.
You've told me no such fucking thing, which makes you a damn liar. As if MEN OF WAR and ALL-STAR WESTERN (one of which I currently buy and read) are super hero books. Unless the Unknown Soldier and Jonah Hex are "superheroes"?
And what the fuck does WD being in different formats, have to do with what the fuck I said? I specifically talked about a high-ticket item, which Poole mentioned. Your inability to keep up in the discussion reveals your flaws, worse than it does him.
If you can't think of anything intelligent to say, how's about sewing your pie-hole shut?? And stop trying to piggyback off of everyone else's responses here, when you don't even know WTF they are talking about?
Better yet, how's about spending more productive time making sure your out-house of a comic book shop doesn't slip any further into the abyss than it already is...
I didn't make any such claim. My claim here and now, is exactly the same as my claim before. But you haven't really been responding to my statements based on what I've said.
Also, I didn't have to make it about the whole article. The whole article (or at least, the part I posted) made it about the whole article. You chose to take 3 words from it, and craft an entire argument based on it. That's your failing, not mine.
I don't believe you can even tell me what the point of the entire article is even about. Otherwise, you wouldn't have been so focused on that, for the sake of the rest of it. Doing what you did, takes that one statement you focus on totally out of context, and therefore meaningless.
Unlike you, I didn't ignore your point about the creative ground. It's just that, given the context of what they were talking about overall, I understood to mean something different than you did. I posted the article exerpt for a reason, but that reason was clearly lost on you.
So, let me know when you've actually read the article (either as a whole, or just the part I posted) in its entirety. Then we can actually have a discussion about it. Until then, you're clearly not equipped.