Unfortunately due to an Apple approval delay, many same day as print books are not being released on time today. That said, you can purchase them on the web and then download your comics on your device via the Purchases tab. Just make sure you’re logged in using the same credentials.
It is easy to interpret this in the light of the Saga situation, imagining every comic being scrutinised by Apple employees before it is allowed to go live through the ComiXology Apps. Chip Mosher of ComiXology told Bleeding Cool;
Please know that because of our business relationship with Apple, we can’t comment on the Saga situation.
But also please know that this approval delay is wholly unrelated and something that has happened periodically in the past.
In light of the content of Saga #12, highlighted by Apple’s ban, a number of retailers have had their own responses.
— LarrysComics.net (@LarrysComics) April 10, 2013
unfortunately, saga #12 was also banned in my local comic shop for its depiction of things that aren’t spider-man, batman or wolverine
— Tom Spurgeon (@comicsreporter) April 10, 2013
@fionastaples UGH. I can’t sell Saga #12 in my store because of the explicit sex on page 1. AND IT’S MY #1 BOOK. This could land me in jail.
— Secret Headquarters (@SHQtallahassee) April 9, 2013
@ernhate We are no longer carrying Saga.
— Secret Headquarters (@SHQtallahassee) April 10, 2013
Charles Brownstein of the CBLDF issued this response;
As I wrote yesterday in our story covering Apple’s ban, it is within Apple’s rights as a private company to refuse to carry the comic. The same is true of any brick and mortar retailer who refuses to carry the book — it’s their business prerogative to determine what they choose to offer.
That said, it’s important to note that while the images are sexually explicit, they and the issue that contains them are protected by the First Amendment. Retailers have a right to sell Saga #12, readers have a right to possess it, and the creators and publisher had the right to create it.
For Saga #12 to be unprotected by the First Amendment, it would need to be found legally obscene — an outcome that is highly unlikely.
In Miller v. California, the Supreme Court created a three-prong test to determine what is obscene. In what is commonly referred to as the “Miller test,” the court mandated that states can regulate material as obscene if it meets all three of the following prongs:
- whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
- whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law; and
- whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Obscenity is always determined by applying local community standards, so each community will have different metrics in determining a whether a piece of work is obscene or not. However, each community must take the work as a whole. This means that all of the contents of Saga #12 must be considered, not just the offending images. Therefore, the entire issue considered as a whole must appeal to the prurient interest, it must depict or describe sexual conduct or excretory functions in a patently offensive way, and it must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Opinions will vary about the merit of the content in Saga #12, as they will with any comic book. However, the likelihood of the material being found to violate all prongs of the Miller Test is extremely slim.
Each retailer must independently determine what they will carry because they are the best expert with regard to knowing what material their community will accept. However, that business decision should be informed by the knowledge that the contents of Saga #12 are protected by the First Amendment.