It doesn't seem like a hundred issues ago that we had the outrage over the Amazing Spider-Man #601 cover. Still, where there's misogyny, there's brass. And cosplay model Stacey Rebecca is selling prints of her recreating that infamous pose...
![]()
It doesn't seem like a hundred issues ago that we had the outrage over the Amazing Spider-Man #601 cover. Still, where there's misogyny, there's brass. And cosplay model Stacey Rebecca is selling prints of her recreating that infamous pose...
![]()
She could have photoshopped the background so it wasn't at an angle or take the pic at the same angle as the poster.
Sigh. I accept the fact that the modern day MJ has a pierced lip.
Issues with the original cover aside, can she legally sell this print with J. Scott Campbell's art in the print? That seems a bit illegal to me.
I found this link to J. Scott Campbell's site while searching Google for what the controversy over this cover involved. (I couldn't use this site's search engine b/c apparently Rich throws the word "misogyny" around more than fat kids eat candy.)
I'm guessing it means Campbell's endorsing this image.
Sidebar: What was the controversy behind this cover?
I know that is how I sit when I am drinking a cup of coffee - with my arms squeezing my pecs together and with my legs in the most uncomfortable tangle imaginable.