I notice Swishy is banned. I think we can all accept that as a good thing, right? Let's try to agree on that one thing at least.
I notice Swishy is banned. I think we can all accept that as a good thing, right? Let's try to agree on that one thing at least.
If you'd like to see my store, a faux movie trailer was shot there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E23B...eature=related
PROUD WINNER OF THE 2012 Best of Cincinnati Comic Shop Award from Citybeat Cincinnati.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this post may contain adult, intelligent humor, ribald satire, biting sarcasm, aggressive cynicism, and even a brutally honest criticism or twelve. If you’ve truly got a serious problem with any of my opinions and/or the style in which they’re presented, feel free to drop me a PM and we’ll actually give it a honest go at working out our differences. Remember, working things out professionally and courteously will make things run smoother around here, eh?
I believe Kirby (as per his TCJ interview) when he states Lee abused his position to get bylines: Jack Kirby Interview | The Comics Journal
Jack outright states Lee takes far, far too much credit for the FF: IE any, beyond dialogue.
Stan Lee has never been fit to lick Jack Kirby's boots, and the King was pretty obviously the conceptual powerhouse behind those comics: Kirby and Lee, and that's insanely generous to the old hack. Jack went on to do New Gods: Stan did... Ravager 2099?
I've seen Romita JR (who I admire) state the same. Do you really think anyone inside of the Marvel circle is going to talk shit about Stan Lee? He's the Marvel Pope.
Writing dialogue (which Lee was effortlessly terrible at) is not the same as creating (which Lee has gone on to prove he is effortlessly terrible at).