Somebody Made A Star Trek Mistake – But Did They Spoil The Villain Mystery?

If you visit a certain page on Entertainment Weekly’s Back Issues Store right now you’ll see a preview of one of their new Star Trek Into Darkness covers. This one shows Chris Pine and Benedict Cumberbatch, though the headline refers to the other one, the design with “Kirk and Spock.”

That’s because they’ve had to make a quick edit. It used to say:

VOYAGE INTO STAR TREK WITH KIRK & KHAN

I didn’t catch a screen cap of this but CBM got this one.

I believe that’s not a fake or photoshop touch up because the page’s URL still reads:

http://backissues.ew.com/storefront/2013/voyage-into-the-new-star-trek-kirk-khan/prodEW20130215A.html

So somebody at EW really did refer to Benedict Cumberbatch‘s villain as Khan. But why?

Because they know who he’s playing? Or because they think they know?

The very first rumours, way back when, had the character pegged as Khan. Has everything since then been nothing more than a smokescreen?

And if EW do know the details, and aren’t just pulling our leg on behalf of Paramount and Bad Robot, are they about to start sharing them?

brendan

Brendan Wright, Editor Of Mind MGMT, Grindhouse, Archie Vs. Predator, Leaves Dark Horse

Gotham Teaser Trailer And When Jerome Met Barbara

Perlmutter/Feige Split Is Only The Start Of Big Marvel Changes

coachthumb

Coach Cancelled At NBC

James Tynion IV And Jeremy Rock’s Horror Comic The Eighth Seal Comes To IDW

spectrethumb

Daniel Craig on Spectre; Noncommittal About More Bond

Confirmed: Valiant’s Shadowman Returns In December, With Glow-In-The-Dark Covers, And Matt Kindt And Doug Braithwaite

michael-shannon

Michael Shannon Walks Back Batman V Superman Comments

Girls Like DC Comics More Than Boys – Numbercrunching DC And Marvel On Social Media

Apple logo

Apple Looking Into Original Content