Somebody Made A Star Trek Mistake – But Did They Spoil The Villain Mystery?

If you visit a certain page on Entertainment Weekly’s Back Issues Store right now you’ll see a preview of one of their new Star Trek Into Darkness covers. This one shows Chris Pine and Benedict Cumberbatch, though the headline refers to the other one, the design with “Kirk and Spock.”

That’s because they’ve had to make a quick edit. It used to say:

VOYAGE INTO STAR TREK WITH KIRK & KHAN

I didn’t catch a screen cap of this but CBM got this one.

I believe that’s not a fake or photoshop touch up because the page’s URL still reads:

http://backissues.ew.com/storefront/2013/voyage-into-the-new-star-trek-kirk-khan/prodEW20130215A.html

So somebody at EW really did refer to Benedict Cumberbatch‘s villain as Khan. But why?

Because they know who he’s playing? Or because they think they know?

The very first rumours, way back when, had the character pegged as Khan. Has everything since then been nothing more than a smokescreen?

And if EW do know the details, and aren’t just pulling our leg on behalf of Paramount and Bad Robot, are they about to start sharing them?

spx

SPX and The Love Hangover

This Possible Plot Synopsis For Jumanji Sounds Pretty Weird

bhcover

New Artist Greg Scott On Sun-Drenched LA Noir And The Black Hood

stl021782

Joe Books To Publish Adaptations Of Disney’s Moana, In December 2016 Solicits

xena201606covaphoto

Xena Greek Mythology – A Nice Academic Meta-Narrative And A Hilarious Creative License

Travelers’ Tips From Sarajevo – Getting Into The Octal Catalogue

ahtd-official-poster

Celebrate Art House Theater Day This Saturday

40th Anniversary 2000AD Comic Con, For London, In February 2017

Why The Guardians Of The Galaxy Won’t Be Going Anywhere (SPOILERS)

kiss01-cov-a-montesdemon

All 14 KISS #1 Covers Plus A John Cassaday Blind Bag Variant