Somebody Made A Star Trek Mistake - But Did They Spoil The Villain Mystery?

If you visit a certain page on Entertainment Weekly’s Back Issues Store right now you’ll see a preview of one of their new Star Trek Into Darkness covers. This one shows Chris Pine and Benedict Cumberbatch, though the headline refers to the other one, the design with “Kirk and Spock.”

That’s because they’ve had to make a quick edit. It used to say:

VOYAGE INTO STAR TREK WITH KIRK & KHAN

I didn’t catch a screen cap of this but CBM got this one.

I believe that’s not a fake or photoshop touch up because the page’s URL still reads:

http://backissues.ew.com/storefront/2013/voyage-into-the-new-star-trek-kirk-khan/prodEW20130215A.html

So somebody at EW really did refer to Benedict Cumberbatch‘s villain as Khan. But why?

Because they know who he’s playing? Or because they think they know?

The very first rumours, way back when, had the character pegged as Khan. Has everything since then been nothing more than a smokescreen?

And if EW do know the details, and aren’t just pulling our leg on behalf of Paramount and Bad Robot, are they about to start sharing them?

stephen amell

Stephen Amell Cast As Casey Jones In TMNT2

Dynamite To Publish Grumpy Cat Comics

game-video-dishonored-background-widescreen-wallpapers-wallwuzz-hd-wallpaper-15234

Dishonored And Never Alone Are Free On PlayStation Plus This Month

Solarman_Vol_1_1

Neal Adams Racebends Stan Lee's Two-Issue Flop, Solarman

CORNELIUS SMITH JR., ADRIANNE PALICKI, EDWARD JAMES OLMOS, HENRY SIMMONS

The Six Important Moments From Marvel's Agents Of SHIELD - One Door Closes

Dark Horse Want Retailers To Rip Up Their Star Wars #1. Are They Joking?

Sunset Overdrive Get's Robo-Themed DLC Rise Of The Dawn Of The Fallen Machines

FlashTrick

The Six Important Moments From The Flash - Tricksters

No Complaints Expected For Milo Manara's 'Yellow Kid' Poster For Naples Comicon

Something Tells Me The PlayStation Flow Isn't Totally Sincere