Somebody Made A Star Trek Mistake – But Did They Spoil The Villain Mystery?

If you visit a certain page on Entertainment Weekly’s Back Issues Store right now you’ll see a preview of one of their new Star Trek Into Darkness covers. This one shows Chris Pine and Benedict Cumberbatch, though the headline refers to the other one, the design with “Kirk and Spock.”

That’s because they’ve had to make a quick edit. It used to say:

VOYAGE INTO STAR TREK WITH KIRK & KHAN

I didn’t catch a screen cap of this but CBM got this one.

I believe that’s not a fake or photoshop touch up because the page’s URL still reads:

http://backissues.ew.com/storefront/2013/voyage-into-the-new-star-trek-kirk-khan/prodEW20130215A.html

So somebody at EW really did refer to Benedict Cumberbatch‘s villain as Khan. But why?

Because they know who he’s playing? Or because they think they know?

The very first rumours, way back when, had the character pegged as Khan. Has everything since then been nothing more than a smokescreen?

And if EW do know the details, and aren’t just pulling our leg on behalf of Paramount and Bad Robot, are they about to start sharing them?

AfterlifeWithArchie3Magazine

Chart Appeal: Sales Stats For December 2014, From Harley Quinn To Wytches, Hellboy And The B.P.R.D. And Sinergy

OctoGraphic-620x

Octodad: Dadliest Catch Made Nearly $5 Million In Sales

Lumberjack

He’s A Lumberjack And He’s Okay, He’ll Be The First Villain In Supergirl’s Way

PPG01

The Powerpuff Girls Super Smash Up #1 Combines Classic Cartoon Network Characters

batman-unlimited-logo

2 DC Toy Lines Spawn Animated Movies

Animals, Humans, Ghosts And Fun – The Center Of Somewhere

Constantine: To Hell And Back – A Whole World Out There

Fairy Fails – Paul Duffield’s Comic For Children In An Adult Industry

WBG-with-bkg2-1400-350x350

We Be Geeks Episode 105: Discussing JLAARP With Jimmy Palmiotti & Amanda Conner

Descender1

Lemire And Nguyen’s Descender Optioned By Sony