Somebody Made A Star Trek Mistake - But Did They Spoil The Villain Mystery?

If you visit a certain page on Entertainment Weekly’s Back Issues Store right now you’ll see a preview of one of their new Star Trek Into Darkness covers. This one shows Chris Pine and Benedict Cumberbatch, though the headline refers to the other one, the design with “Kirk and Spock.”

That’s because they’ve had to make a quick edit. It used to say:

VOYAGE INTO STAR TREK WITH KIRK & KHAN

I didn’t catch a screen cap of this but CBM got this one.

I believe that’s not a fake or photoshop touch up because the page’s URL still reads:

http://backissues.ew.com/storefront/2013/voyage-into-the-new-star-trek-kirk-khan/prodEW20130215A.html

So somebody at EW really did refer to Benedict Cumberbatch‘s villain as Khan. But why?

Because they know who he’s playing? Or because they think they know?

The very first rumours, way back when, had the character pegged as Khan. Has everything since then been nothing more than a smokescreen?

And if EW do know the details, and aren’t just pulling our leg on behalf of Paramount and Bad Robot, are they about to start sharing them?

BlackBatReturns100

Moonstone Brings Back The Black Bat Prose

Every Justice League Member Ever

14345860051

Arkham Knight Director Explains The Role Of The Batmobile In The Game

Iron_Fist_TLW_1_Cover

To Mystic Or Not To Mystic - Marvel's Question On Iron Fist

arcadefestus

Booze Geek - Festus Rotgut Features Short Comic Strips By Jason Aaron

Tiffany Smith Sings Every Playable Character In Lego Batman 3

a5

James Robinson Responds To Transgender Controversy Over Airboy

2807273-trailer_justcause3_20150213

Avalanche: 'Destruction In Just Cause 3 Will Make You Michael Bay'

The John Carter That Could Have Been

The Road North