Did Michael Bay Ditch The 3D Cameras Part Way Through Transformers 3?
Post-production 3D gets a bad rap. Heck – native, production 3D gets a bad wrap. But I’m a firm believer in the potential of the format, and I can even see the value in using post-production 3D techniques where appropriate.
Some time before production kicked off, Bay went on the record saying that the films would never be in 3D at all, that he considered 3D a gimmick and so on. Then, unsurprisingly, as the start of filming drew near, we learned that the film would be shot in stereo after all. Before long there was confirmation that the Pace camera system (aka the Avatar set-up, though it’s been tweaked since even then) was in use on the shoot.
The latest twist comes from ScreenRant, citing “a source close to Bay”. They tell us that the plans changed when the production moved to Chicago and, since then, the film has been shot in 2D with an eye to a post-production upconvert.
If it’s true, then I’m not mystified by this decision at all. Bay likes nothing if it’s not swinging his camera about recklessly and, whether or not he’s right, he’ll likely be convinced that his familiar 2D kit offers more freedom and liberty. The decision to ditch the 3D rig should help Bay get closer to the visual style he wants in the way he was used to getting it.
And there was me thinking the 3D camera was going to force him to be more thoughtful and change his approach a little.
I met Michael Bay for about six seconds once. It didn’t even register for him, so I know he won’t remember, but for my part, I still have the odd chuckle now and then…